The suggestion arrives as a complete package
The system handles the repetitive preparation of the content, but does not take over the decision about whether it should be published on the channel.
Friday post about the SPA package
The calendar schedules publication in two days. The objective, channel, current offer and approved materials are already available.
Copy and graphic after checking
AI prepares the package, identifies the sources and reason for the suggestion, and presents the result to the team without triggering publication.
- ready-to-use copy and graphic
- objective, channel, timing and rationale
- check results and sources
Proactive preparation, with human decision-making
This is the first level at which the system starts working on planned content by itself. It combines generators, the calendar and checking, while every suggestion remains in the queue for a decision.
Starts preparation
It identifies an upcoming calendar item and starts preparing the complete set of materials.
Assembles the full package
It brings together the copy, graphic, channel, timing, objective, sources and rationale in one suggestion.
Carries out checks
It checks the material before showing it to the team and adds comments requiring a decision.
How is a publishing suggestion created?
Task selection
The system finds an upcoming, complete calendar item that follows the rules.
Copy preparation
The generator creates a version based on the objective, channel and approved facts.
Graphic preparation
The system selects approved materials and creates a version in the required format.
Checking and decision
The checked package goes to an employee, who approves, edits, reschedules or rejects it.
The complete suggestion shows its origins
The team can see which plan item, offer, rules and materials were used to create the package. An uncertain fact or resource with an unclear status holds the suggestion for clarification.
What does AI use?
- approved calendar item
- publishing rules and fact sources
- post and graphic generators
- content check result
What does the team receive?
- complete copy and graphic for review
- objective, channel, timing, sources and rationale
- check status and possible team decisions
Proactivity does not mean autonomous publication
The system can prepare a suggestion without a separate instruction, but it does not send it to the channel. Every item awaits an explicit decision from an employee.
An employee approves, edits, reschedules or rejects the suggestion and decides whether to pass it on for scheduling.
The module does not publish posts, approve its own materials, expand the rules or run an autonomous content cycle.
Less manual launching of each stage
The copy, graphic, timing and check appear together in one queue.
Upcoming calendar items do not wait for each generator to be launched manually.
Every suggestion can be edited, rescheduled or rejected before publication.
Four modules create one suggestion
The Post generator, Graphic generator, Content calendar and Content checks provide all the elements needed to prepare a complete suggestion.
Related process elements
Frequently asked questions
What starts the preparation of a suggestion?
Usually, an upcoming and sufficiently complete item in the approved content calendar.
Does an employee have to launch the generators separately?
No. The system can prepare the copy, graphic and checks based on the planned item.
Does the suggestion go automatically to social media?
No. It awaits approval, changes, rescheduling or rejection by an employee.
What happens when a fact is uncertain?
The suggestion flags the gap and should not proceed until the team clarifies it.